As-Planned VS As Built: The Most Popular Delay Analysis Method Explained

Delay Analysis

FORMULATION | ANALYSIS | MANAGEMENT

I often teach the different delay analysis methods in a variety of settings. One of the questions I am asked the most often is: What is the most popular method of delay analysis? Several research studies have attempted to answer this question. A recent study ranked the common delay analysis methods as follows in terms of popularity:
Dr Hendrik Prinsloo is an expert witness and specialist in the analysis construction delay claims

Table of Contents

Delay Analysis MethodUsage IndexRank
As-planned vs as-built65.71
Impacted as-planned59.42
Collapsed as-built54.83
Time impact analysis48.24
Net impact45.75
Global45.56
Window analysis40.27
S-Curve33.88

In this article, the application of the As-Planned vs As-Built method is discussed looking into the steps to apply it, limitations, and when this method is suitable.

Description:

A comparison of critical path activities on the as-planned (baseline) programme with the same activities on the as-built programme to establish the net impact on the completion date.

Requirements to utilise this method:

  • Baseline Programme with critical path
  • As-built Programme with critical path

Time of application:

  • Retrospectively
  • The actual effect of the delay event has been experienced
  • The analysis is done after the project completion or after the effect of the delay event ceased

Steps:

  1. Use the initial as-planned (baseline) programme and the as-built programme for the project.
  2. Compare each activity on the critical path of the as-planned (baseline) programme with the same activity on the as-built programme.
  3. Determine the net impact on the completion date by taking into account increased and decreased activity durations.

Limitations:

  • It does not take into account the dynamic nature of the critical path.
  • It does not determine the individual effect for each delay on the project completion date.
  • As-built programmes are time-consuming to develop and are not always readily available.
  • The utilisation of as-built information to develop the as-built programme can lead to manipulation.
  • Considerable skill and experience are required to develop an accurate as-built programme.
  • Accuracy will be impacted by deficiencies in the as-built programme.

Choose this method when:

  • The compound effect of a number of delays needs to be established.
  • Updated programmes and detailed progress updates are not available.
  • Information on delay events is not readily available.

 

Available on Amazon